Blog

The Week That Was 60 and the Week That Was 0

I have weeks that look like a real block. I have weeks that look like I quit. Both are true. Both stay on the page. Not only the tidy version.

A 1:21 half and a sub-38 10K did not come from a life where every week is 60. They also did not come from a life where every week is zero. They came from both showing up in the same year, sometimes in the same month, at about 5,300 feet in Enterprise, Southern Utah.

Alex T. Baker running a canyon road at Bryce, red rock and pines on the bend behind him.
The week that happened. Including the blank ones.

What a 60-mile week actually looks like here

Sixty is not a personality. It is a week where the calendar and the body lined up.

In a week like that I am usually running most days. Long is the day that decides whether the week holds. Quality happens if it happens—workout, or it dies and the week still stands. Kids' practice, agency work, school, and sleep still eat the same hours they always do. The miles fit in the leftover time, not the other way around.

Last one that cleared that bar: Mon Aug 24 – Sun Aug 30, 2026. 62.7 miles, runs only. Six days run (Mon–Sat). Sunday was walk only. Long was 11.8 on Saturday—Mountain Miles. Quality was Tuesday: Heat and speed, 10.0 miles.

I can hold sub-6:00 per mile for three or four miles when I am sharp. That does not mean every Tuesday is a workout. It means when the week is intact, the speed is still there under the volume. When the week is not intact, the speed waits.

Altitude is not a vibe. Local hills, wind, heat, and the elevation tax the same work you would do at sea level. A 60-mile week here is not the same stimulus as 60 at lower altitude. I do not pretend otherwise.

Sitting on the grass after a race, medal on, shoes off.
After

What a 0-mile week actually looks like here

Zero is not a strategy post. It is Monday through Sunday without a run that counts.

It can be sickness. It can be a week the agency ate. It can be family. It can be nothing dramatic—just no miles. I have had ~70-mile weeks. I have had 0-mile weeks. Writing only about the 70s would be a different brand.

Last calendar week at zero run miles: Mon Jul 27 – Sun Aug 2, 2026. The no-run stretch around it ran Sat Jul 25 – Sun Aug 2—nine days. What the plan was supposed to be that week is unknown. The reason is not on Strava. The miles are still zero.

The log does not get rewritten after. Planned vs actual includes blanks. If the long was supposed to be 18 and it became nothing, that is the entry. If quality died, quality died. Those weeks stay visible.

Why both weeks belong in the same story

Most training content sells one shape of week and treats the other as failure. I race mid-pack-but-fast for my life shape. I coach 6th–8th grade cross country. I am 37, married, two kids, full-time student, solo marketing agency. Fast running, real life—not a feed of unbroken streaks.

Search people type things like training with a full-time job and kids and coming back after a week off running because their weeks look like mine, not like a camp. If the only pages that rank are never miss a day plans, those searchers get coached into a rebound that breaks them.

What matters here is the week that happened, including the blank ones. And coming back from a 0-mile week without jumping straight toward 70. That is how the logs work and how the next week gets built.

Coming back without making it up

After zeros, the mistake is stacking the missed long runs into the next seven days. That is how you turn one blank week into three messy ones.

After 0–10 days off (not injured), re-entry looks like this:

  • Days 1–2: easy 20–40 minutes, conversational only
  • Day 3: off or walk
  • Day 4: easy, optional short strides
  • No long run and no workout in the first four days back
  • Days 5–7: easy only; long capped at about 50–60% of the last real long—not a makeup long
  • Quality returns in week 2 back, not week 1
  • Never 0 → 70. Missed miles stay missed.

Re-entry is smaller than the ego wants. Long might be 10, not 18. Quality waits. Volume comes back on that line, not a guilt schedule.

If you are searching this because you just lost a week: the useful move is not trust the process. The useful move is writing down what the week actually was, then running the smaller week in front of you.

Alex T. Baker running the Bryce Canyon Half Marathon on a two-lane desert highway.

Speed that survives a full life

The half and the 10K matter because they are proof the speed can sit next to the mess. They are not proof every week will be 60.

I am not selling anyone can do this if they want it. Plenty of people want it and still get zero weeks. The question is whether your training language still works when the week blanks out. Mine has to. Otherwise the story is lying.

St. George Marathon on October 3 is the current named goal—sub-3. Training at about 5,300 feet for a downhill / desert marathon is a different piece. This one is only about living with both week shapes without deleting one of them.

Keep the blank weeks on the page

Dated weeks beat tidy myths. Search can tell the difference. So can anyone who has lived both a 62.7 and a zero in the same season. The point is not to romanticize the blank week. The point is to stop deleting it so the next week can be built from something true.

If your week was 0 and you still care about the block

Cut the week. Do not quit the block.

Put the actual miles in the log, even if the number is zero. Take the next week from a plan that already assumes you will miss days.

The block I’m using to go under 3:00 is free if you want it.